Reviews

Issue No. 115 November 2007
http://www.thisweekinpalestine.com/details.php?id=2307&ed=147&edid=147
Jerusalem…The east side story (2007) Dispossession, Occupation, and
a Challenge to Survive
By Sam
Bahour
October 2007
Was it sheer
coincidence, sad irony, or just another day in Palestinian life
under Israeli military occupation? It was hard to tell. My father
and I drove through the last Israeli checkpoint between Ramallah and
Jerusalem while heading to the Palestinian National Theatre at the
invitation of The Palestinian Agricultural Relief Committees (PARC)
to attend the premiere of a new documentary on Jerusalem. The car
radio switched from music to a news report - another Palestinian
home in Jerusalem was demolished this morning by Israeli occupation
authorities, leaving yet another Palestinian family homeless. We
listened in disgust, sighed, but did not comment to each other for
we would only be repeating ourselves.
As we
entered the plaza of the theatre, we were met by film director
Mohammed Alatar. Mohammed is known for his outstanding previous
documentary, The Iron Wall, which depicted the systematic
Israeli strategy of creating facts on the ground - facts that are
rapidly making any chance for a negotiated peace between
Palestinians and Israelis increasingly unlikely.
Tonight, the
theatre was packed tight. Young and old local Palestinian
Jerusalemites, staff from the dozens of international agencies based
in Jerusalem, donor representatives, foreign representatives, media,
and the crew that produced the film were all present. The audience
anxiously awaited the lights to be turned out and the film to start.
One constituency that was clearly missing was Palestinians from the
West Bank and Gaza. Those from Bethlehem, Ramallah, Nablus, Jericho,
Gaza, Rafah, and Hebron are all prohibited by Israeli regulations
from entering Jerusalem without special permits that are rarely
issued. The Iron Wall and tonight’s film, Jerusalem…The
east side story, reveal the strategic policies that aim to
Judaize the city and control Palestinian demographic growth. The
resulting collective punishment is part of a larger scheme to
pressure Palestinians into submission or flight.
Jerusalem…The
east side story
is a documentary that squeezes nearly 100 years of history into an
hour or so of cinema. It mainly exposes the past 40 years of Israeli
military occupation policies in Jerusalem and their devastating
impact on the city and its peoples.
The producer
of the film, Ms. Terry Boullata, stated at the outset of the evening
that the intention of the documentary is to bring the Palestinian
struggle for freedom and independence to the Western audience who
has shown by way of its acquiescence to the ongoing Israeli military
occupation that it still needs to be educated.
The film
kicks off with a rapid-fire collage of a normal day in Jerusalem.
The famous Jerusalem sesame-seed round loaf of bread, people from
all walks of life, from all religions worshiping their Gods, the
traffic, the city dwellers, the Old City shops, Jewish kids playing,
Moslem kids playing, Christian kids playing, and on and on. The
collage happens in a way that makes it difficult to decipher who is
who. If it were not for a few abnormal shots - soldiers, weapons,
checkpoints, settlements, arrests, confrontation, Jewish-only
settlements, house demolitions, and many other trappings of a
military occupation peppered throughout what can be considered
normal life - one could falsely imagine that coexistence already
existed.
One at a
time, the film picks up on these abnormal scenes - concisely,
succinctly, and with a clear effort to maintain utmost accuracy.
Before taking on each issue, a load of history is presented using
black-and-white footage. Some of the shots are from the United
Nations hall where General Assembly Resolution 181 to partition
Palestine was voted on in 1947; the battles in Jerusalem in 1967,
which ended with Israel militarily occupying all of East Jerusalem;
and Palestinian refugees streaming over the border to Jordan in
order to flee the fighting. This rarely seen footage strikes a raw
nerve in most Palestinians as could be witnessed by many in the
audience just shaking their heads at the scenes of violent
dispossession in action.
The film
brings many Jerusalemites, including many Jewish Israelis, to tell
their story firsthand. Several accounts caught my attention. The
first was that of Mr. Meron Benvenisti, an Israeli political
scientist who was deputy mayor of Jerusalem under Teddy Kollek from
1971 to 1978. Mr. Benvenisti makes a case for the more than 10,000
Palestinians who were displaced by Israel from West Jerusalem after
Israel was created in 1948, and became internally displaced persons
while still in their city - albeit forced to the east side.
The other
moving personal account is of a Palestinian woman from West
Jerusalem, Mrs. Nahla Assali, who walks the audience around the home
that her family fled in 1948, only to come back after the war to
find a Jewish family living in it and a plush Israeli neighbourhood
replacing her childhood environs. Mrs. Assali ends her sombre
account with a sentence that speaks volumes. She says, “We live in
fantasy, they live in denial, and one day we should both come to
reality.”
Another
personality who appears throughout the film to add his insight is
the bishop of the Evangelical Lutheran Church in Jordan and the Holy
Land, the Rt. Rev. Munib Younan. Rev. Younan speaks with the clarity
expected from a man of the cloth and is unwavering in his demand for
both a moral and legal compass to be used to bring Jerusalem out of
its dangerous disorientation.
Throughout
the film, the selection of music is superb. Arabic and English clips
take the audience from one issue to the next, but each song is a
deep reflection of the issue at hand. One tune that is repeated
throughout is, “I Still Haven’t Found What I’ve Been Looking for” by
the band U2 - a relevant choice for anyone looking for peaceful
coexistence in Jerusalem in the 21st century.
One of the
most moving parts of the film is its coverage of the phenomenon of
house demolitions. The film meticulously goes through the process of
how the Israeli occupation authorities have administratively
installed a system of occupation that is sugar-coated with a legal
wrap, but leads to the same end as all the other measures of the
occupation: to contain and control Palestinian demographic growth
through destroying Palestinian livelihood and creating a reality
that is designed to encourage the Palestinians to choose to exit
rather than stay and demand their rights. One young schoolgirl
explains how she came home from school one day to find her family’s
home demolished by Israeli bulldozers. Her mother explains how she
sat in the rubble waiting for her daughter to return home from
school fearing the shock that her daughter was about to experience.
This account brought tears to my eyes.
Experts on
the subject of house demolitions state in the film that once a
demolition order is issued by the Israeli authorities, the
Palestinian home may be demolished in 24 hours or 24 years. The film
attempts to depict what a nerve-wracking reality this creates for
hundreds of Palestinian families in Jerusalem whose homes are
already marked for demolition.
The film
explains in bite-size history lessons how Jerusalem was not only
conquered by force, but also how the State of Israel took distinct
annexation measures to enlarge the city boundaries in order to block
the possibility of a sustainable Palestinian presence in the city.
Meshed with this discussion is the most recent manifestation of
Israel’s separation policy: the illegal separation barrier - part
wall and part fence - which cuts through Palestinian neighbourhoods
in Jerusalem and leaves Palestinian Jerusalemites in utter limbo.
Palestinian
President Mahmoud Abbas is interviewed and equates the Israeli
policy in Jerusalem with that of “ethnic cleansing.” His statement
is bound to catch the ear of all those on the Israeli right and in
the U.S. Congress who would like no better than to label President
Abbas a non-partner in peace negotiations, as they successfully did
with Yasser Arafat.
I’ve only
mentioned a few samples of what this film presents. The most
shocking ones I’ll leave to your viewing, especially the episode
that relates to activities carried out by the Jewish settler
movement inside the walled Old City, in collusion with official
Israeli authorities.
If you have
a desire for justice, you will exit this film with your blood
boiling. Then you may recall that, in the face of all of this,
Palestinians have remained steadfast for decades while they have
been acted upon as if they were mice in a laboratory experiment.
Saluting the resilience of Palestinians will be a natural reaction
to all these emotions. However, if you hold a U.S. passport and
recall that it is U.S. political support and funding that has
allowed things to reach this level of inhumanity, you will walk away
disgraced, rightfully so. This feeling of disgrace toward the U.S.
will also be felt as the audience bursts out in laughter when
President Bush is shown speaking - or rather stuttering - about
Israel’s illegal separation barrier and says, “This wall is … uh … a
problem ...”
I also
watched the film premiere a second time in Ramallah for those in the
West Bank, given that they could not freely travel to Jerusalem. It
was another packed house, with the walls of the Al-Kasaba Theatre
and Cinematheque in Ramallah taking the standing overflow of the
audience.
Next to me
in the first row sat a young family: Laura, a beautiful six-year-old
girl, and her parents. I was pleasantly disturbed when, throughout
the film, Laura repeatedly whispered to her mother “What’s this?”
She asked this when the screen showed Palestinians being arrested,
when homes were being demolished, when people were being harassed at
checkpoints, and at other times. Seeing this young girl nag her mom
for an explanation at every one of these scenes gave me a tremendous
sense of relief that today’s globalised generation of Palestinians
will not drop the torch of this just cause. Knowing that Palestinian
mothers across the occupied territory and throughout refugee camps
in Palestine and abroad are explaining our just cause to yet another
generation (regretfully I’m sure) somehow makes up for the lack of
coherence and leadership today.
Director
Mohammed Alatar made a few comments following the Jerusalem
premiere. He said that he did not make the film so that people would
like it, because there is nothing to like in military occupation;
but rather he hopes and prays that people will wake up to today’s
bitter reality in the historic city of Jerusalem and do what it
takes to bring peace to this troubled city. His remarks echoed the
closing of the film which, instead of taking sides, noted that the
ultimate loser in this conflict is Jerusalem, the city. One of the
closing statements by the narrator is, “When the stones of Jerusalem
become more holy than its people, doesn’t it lose its holiness? - A
question well worth reflecting upon.
Don’t miss
this one. |